| 1)
Academic and articulation barriers |
| Challenge: |
Possible
solutions: |
| Without
the existence of an articulation agreement, some four-year
colleges require transfer students to retake courses they
already completed at the community college. |
Articulation
agreements between institutions would help, but students must
be aware that these agreements exist. Additionally, there
must be communication between individuals responsible for
course content and the transfer process at both the four-year
and two-year institutions. Additional strategies that might
be helpful include: dual admission, encouraging classic transfer,
optimizing the amount of credit accepted in transfer, and
keeping community college students from transferring too early. |
| 2)
Institutional bureaucracy |
| Challenge: |
Possible
solutions: |
| The
stringent rules, regulations, and requirements for transfer
at some universities can keep students from transferring.
Often times, overall GPA is the deciding factor for accepting
the student, while the student’s overall academic
history is ignored. |
Both
institutions could make meaningful and comprehensive printed
information about the transfer process available to students.
The four-year institution could review and revise any unnecessary
bureaucratic procedures, and encourage personnel to reconsider
selective admissions practices that limit a number of community
college students from transferring. |
| 3)
Geography |
| Challenge: |
Possible
solutions: |
| One
of the conveniences of community colleges is that most students
are within commuting distance of an institution. This is not
always the case for four-year institutions. |
In
Florida, some communities are not located near universities,
so the state government allows the community colleges to
offer a limited selection of bachelor’s in high demand
fields. Additionally, some community colleges in Arkansas,
Georgia, Nevada, New York, and Utah now offer a bachelor’s
degree. |
| 4)
Economic concerns |
| Challenge: |
Possible
solutions: |
| There
is a distinct cost difference between public community colleges
and four-year institutions. For students from low-income families
(a high percentage of community college students), the colleges
are out of financial reach. |
Both
four- and two-year institutions could make information about
financial aid opportunities readily available to students. |
| 5)
Age |
| Challenge: |
Possible
solutions: |
| The
culture, programs, and services offered by four-year institutions
tend to cater to the traditional college student. For adults,
there may be uncertainty and apprehension about being in classes
that are full of traditional age students; and they may also
lack confidence in their own abilities. |
Advisors
could be aware of and sensitive to the specific needs of older
students. This is another barrier, which with collaboration
between the two institutions, could be alleviated. Community
colleges work with adult students to a greater extent then
four-year institutions, so the college can share information
on specific student services important to the adult learner. |
| 6)
Race/Ethnicity |
| Challenge: |
Possible
solutions: |
| For
students who are in a minority group, the typically less diverse
and larger four-year campuses may create a belief that the
college has a non-supportive culture, and does not welcome
those who are different. |
The
four-year institution could be aware of its multicultural
students, and could ensure that adequate student services
exist to deal with the specific needs. Advisors could develop
a multicultural perspective, and this might be accomplished
through in-service or other forms of training. |
| 7)
Occupational or vocational programs |
| Challenge: |
Possible
solutions: |
| Four-year
colleges may be hesitant to accept a student who has been
enrolled in an occupational or vocational program instead
of a transfer-preparation program. Students who graduated
with a terminal degree may also find more problems transferring
than students with an A.A. degree. |
The
only solution to this concern is an articulation agreement,
even on a program level. As shown by the University of
Maryland and Montgomery College Nursing agreement, when
course content is evaluated by both institutions, transferring
credits becomes easier. |
| 8)
First-generation students |
| Challenge: |
Possible
solutions: |
| First-generation
college students often deal with academic and personal
challenges that they have never dealt with, and are not
prepared for. Community colleges may be better suited to
deal with these students since the majority start off in
a community college. |
Some
effective strategies include enhanced counseling, advising
services, using faculty advisors, and Coordinated Studies
Programs (CSPs). CSPs bring faculty from different parts
of the college together for an interdisciplinary approach
to teaching. |
| 9)
Single-parents |
| Challenge: |
Possible
solutions: |
| Simply
attending an institution as a single-parent can be a difficult
task, let alone transferring to a four-year institution. Many
universities may not have the needed student services available. |
This
is another example where the student services offered by the
institution must address the specific needs of the student.
Besides the obvious childcare concerns, colleges must be sensitive
to the needs of these individuals. Again, this is an area
where collaboration between institutions could occur. |
| 10)
Accreditation |
| Challenge: |
Possible
solutions: |
| Although
the AACC definition of community colleges includes only those
colleges with either full regional accreditation or candidacy
status, not all two-year colleges are regionally accredited.
Most four-year colleges will not accept the transfer credits
from a nationally accredited institution. |
Due
to the more stringent accreditation standards from regional
associations, the likelihood that four-year institutions will
accept credits from a non-regionally accredited institution
is slim. The real solution here is that the two-year college
must apply for and receive accreditation status from a regional
association to successfully transfer students. |
|